UFO Evidence Scrubbed—Disclosure Nears—Termination & Deleted Archives Confirm It All!

UFO Evidence Scrubbed—Disclosure Nears—Termination & Deleted Archives Confirm It All!

Telling a Friend Why I Think Corey Goode MIGHT Be Legit

My Friend Writes:

I think Corey is obviously making up stuff as he goes, he has nothing to back him up at all, and he has plagiarized others heavily as shown by some DJ interviews. I think Delong is legit in his interest and his effort, but CIA guys are obviously pulling the strings which means whatever disclosures could come out of it will be very controlled to fit an agenda. As shown by some DJ interviews, this follows an old disclosure pattern, an old formula.

But DJ is introducing another level of propaganda, like tying the JFK assassination to UFO disclosure, saying he was assassinated because he planned to spill the beans.

This scene is riddled with disinformation and has been since day one it seems. It is interesting to watch. The whole scene may have been set-up to construct a myth to give the military-industrial complex a really expensive fake enemy down the line - AQ 2.0?

My Reply:

The disclosure is controlled. The top presidential expert Grant Cameron says Trump has been briefed and told them to carry on with soft disclosure. I can't see it happening any other way. I've had two precognitive experiences while meditating on Corey's material. Once I saw a blue avian hugging me and it was a very real experience. Very visual and visceral. I could feel the feathers. Then the person on the podcast in the background talked about an avian hugging her! Also, I completely visualized the look of the Anshar (who reportedly contact people via meditation and consciousness based technology) who Goode talks about and had a dream like but vivid meditation experience about them where I also thought of the word "temporal" just before hearing it. I had no idea what they were supposed to look like before this experience.

I might just be psychic though. That's what blogger Steve Weathers thinks. There certainly is a SSP, however, and Trump's space force is a soft SSP disclosure as well. The first video below in my list of further research materials is from David Wilcock where he details why he believes Corey. He noted that if he isn't legit, it's the most ambitious deception ever. Basically, Corey knew a lot of secret details from many known government whistleblowers. Dr. Michael Salla believes Goode for the same reason and also because of his body language and consistency of his testimony in both written and verbal form, which use different areas of the brain.

If he is a fake, he must be a plant which implies a big reality to the subject. Also noteworthy is the blue bird men in antiquity stories. All of these arguments supporting Goode can be found in the following videos...

Advanced Technology Reports Leaked by Corey Goode Confirmed by Leading Scientist





Interestingly, project bluebird was part of the MK Ultra mind control program. Another possibility?

Are the Blue Avians and Secret Space Program Real?:

http://undebunkingufos.blogspot.com/2015/09/are-blue-avians-and-secret-space.html

Guide to Non-Terrestrial Beings - COSMIC DISCLOSURE w/Corey Goode - Alien Species & Agenda Guide - The Corey Goode SSP Fiasco:

http://undebunkingufos.blogspot.com/2019/01/guide-to-non-terrestrial-beings-cosmic.html

Richard Dolan argues that "disclosure" of UFOs is happening, albeit within a controlled setting. 🛸

http://undebunkingufos.blogspot.com/2019/04/richard-dolan-argues-that-disclosure-of.html

A Conversation Regarding Tom DeLong, Disinformation, Grant Cameron, & UFO Disclosure Under Trump:

http://undebunkingufos.blogspot.com/2017/11/a-conversation-regarding-tom-delong.html

Truth Teller's Radio Episode 13 - UFO Disclosure is Happening RIGHT NOW Under Trump:

http://truthtellersradio.blogspot.com/2017/11/truth-tellers-radio-episode-13-ufo.html

Space Force:

http://undebunkingufos.blogspot.com/search?q=space+force

BLUEBIRD Deliberate Creation of Multiple  Personality by Psychiatrists:

https://www.wanttoknow.info/bluebird10pg

Two Key Things That Got Overlooked About Project MK Ultra:

http://mindtreasury.blogspot.com/2017/09/two-key-things-that-got-overlooked.html

https://disclosure.fandom.com/wiki/Anshar



Lead Content Producer at Gaia Comes Out Against Corey Goode, and Corey's Damage Control VS The Other Side of the Story... You Decide!

https://undebunkingufos.blogspot.com/2019/06/lead-content-producer-at-gaia-comes-out.html

Richard Dolan argues that "disclosure" of UFOs is happening, albeit within a controlled setting. 🛸

The UFO subject continues to slip out, more and more, into our public discourse.👽

What is the result? 🤔

Richard Dolan argues that "disclosure" of UFOs is happening, albeit within a controlled setting. 🛸https://t.co/2iTPPDumdL

#RichardDolan #UFO #IntelligentDisclosure pic.twitter.com/43ymRIudKa

— Richard Dolan (@RichDolan) April 25, 2019

Related:

Truth Teller's Radio Episode 13 - UFO Disclosure is Happening RIGHT NOW Under Trump:

http://truthtellersradio.blogspot.com/2017/11/truth-tellers-radio-episode-13-ufo.html

Denver Airport Gargoyle & a Fake Alien Invasion (Highlights 106)

Denver Airport Gargoyle & a Fake Alien Invasion (Highlights 106)

Related:

Debunking Eric Dubay's 200 Flat Earth Proofs, Debunking Flat Earth Without Citing NASA, Debunking Scriptural Case for Flat Earth, & More...

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2016/06/debunking-eric-dubays-200-flat-earth.html 

Flat earthers debunked themselves twice in the Netflix documentary Beyond the Curve: 

https://www.elitereaders.com/flat-earthers-debunk-themselves-netflix-documentary/?cn-reloaded=1

SpaceX DECIMATES Flat Earth Nonsense!! - SpaceX Proves The Earth is NOT Flat - SpaceX: More Falcon Heavy landing proof. Live Video of Earth as seen from Elon Musk's Tesla roaster. Flat Earth debunked again. - SpaceX stream live Car CGI glitch? No... 

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2018/02/spacex-decimates-flat-earth-nonsense.html

Michael Shermer the Pseudo Skeptical Propagandist

When it comes to disinformation and pushing official propaganda 'Skeptic' Michael Shermer is perhaps one of the best known talking heads in the mainstream media. With his use of trick arguments, often delivered as sweeping and false generalisations, including blanket denials that are made by appealing (wrongly) to an argument from authority, it sure looks as if Shermer is behaving as an experimental psychologist (his PhD). All too often Shermer's debating influence rests on misrepresentation or psychological/superficial means rather than through sound reason and verified fact.

This short expose will show where two separate researchers identified key problems with Michael Shermer’s arguments showing that Shermer mischaracterises 911 truth arguments, that he does not apply scientific principles, and that he muddles specific issues with all manner of conjecture and other matters not directly related to the specific questions raised by the data.

Shermer claims he follows the scientific method, but this is false.

The second critic of Shermer's listed here, Professor Anthony Hall, pointed out that Dr Shermer’s disinformation operates in large part through ‘guilt by association’ tactics (along with straw men arguments) and characterises this operation as a media performance, in which he (Shermer) peddles generalised or misrepresented dismissals of evidence, claiming academic rigor while obviously not practicing it.

Indeed, Shermer's tarring of 911 critics with the brush of mental illness, when appealing to a mass audience, can fool many people, but to a rational mind this is clearly a method of distraction away from dealing with the hard facts, which he misrepresents. Data or arguments are either substantiated or unsubstantiated - the state of one's mental health has no bearing when you are looking at specific details in science.

The first critic of Shermer quoted here is noted 911 researcher Jim Hoffman who saw through Dr Shermer's attempts at disinformation in 2005. Clipped from his 911 Research site is the following material that addresses Shermer's disregard of the scientific method:


Shermer's Unscientific Method

In fact, Shermer's entire method of attacking "conspiracy theories" is unscientific. Consider his language. Scientists almost never use universal quantifiers such as all to describe inexact phenomena. For being published in a magazine titled Scientific American, Shermer is fond of sweeping generalizations:

The mistaken belief that a handful of unexplained anomalies can undermine a well-established theory lies at the heart of all conspiratorial thinking (as well as creationism, Holocaust denial and the various crank theories of physics).
All the "evidence" for a 9/11 conspiracy falls under the rubric of this fallacy.
All the 9/11 conspiracy claims are this easily refuted.

There are several errors in Shermer's assertion that "a handful of unexplained anomalies" cannot "undermine a well-established theory".

1. A single anomaly can undermine a well-established theory, as illustrated by the success of a single anomaly -- the Michelson-Morley experiment -- in overturning the well-established theory of ether.
2. The unexplained anomalies of the official story are better described as a mountain than a handful.
3. The official story is not well established in any scientific or legal sense, but only in the sense of being endorsed by corrupt government bodies, such as the 9/11 Commission, and unquestioningly embraced by nearly all media.

Shermer's approach is worse than unscientific -- it's fraudulent. He misrepresents his opponent's positions and attempts to associate them with nonsensical and offensive ideas. While failing to identify a single argument of the hundreds made by 911Research, Shermer fraudulently implies that our entire case rests on a straw man argument built on a single fact:

Such notions are easily refuted by noting that scientific theories are not built on single facts alone but on a convergence of evidence assembled from multiple lines of inquiry.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No melted steel, no collapsed towers.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For example, according to www.911research.wtc7.net, steel melts at a temperature of 2,777 degrees Fahrenheit, but jet fuel burns at only 1,517 degrees F. No melted steel, no collapsed towers.

One needs only to read the slides for my talk The World Trade Center Demolition to appreciate Shermer's disregard for the truth. In that talk, we refer to the vast bodies of evidence compiled on the 911Research site and apply them in multiple lines of inquiry, examining:

The historical record on the effects of fires in steel-framed skyscrapers
The evidence-destruction operation at Ground Zero
The failures of the column-failure and truss-failure theories
The unverifiability of the progressive collapse theory
The Twin Towers' collapse features -- the symmetry, rapidity, blast wave, pulverization, and excess heat -- consistent only with controlled demolition
Four proofs that the Twin Towers were destroyed through controlled demolition
[Please visit the original article for linked information on these points.]

David Ray Griffin's The New Pearl Harbor, which Shermer insults as "conspiratorial codswallop," takes a similar approach. Contrary to the column's implication, Griffin explicitly developed his thesis as a "cumulative argument" (p. Xiv), which he summarizes in terms of 24 different lines of inquiry (pp. 132-34).

Shermer's attack could hardly be more hypocritical. He pays lip service to the kind of cumulative argument known as inference to the best explanation, which requires the consideration of all the relevant evidence. But he avoids the vast bodies of evidence cited by skeptics like Griffin, and fails to correctly state even a single one of their arguments. Instead, Shermer embeds mentions of the works of serious skeptics within a tapestry of ludicrous ideas so as to discredit them through guilt-by-association. This approach has nothing to do with science and everything to do with sophistry.
Source: http://www.911research.wtc7.net/essays/sciam/index.html


We should note that there is ALSO evidence of melted structural steel that rational truth advocates cannot not associate at all with Jet Fuel, but only with the independent demolition of the buildings. Regardless of whether Melted Steel is necessary to bring down the Towers it has been identified in abundance.

Shermer and many skeptics have outright denied, or tried (and failed) to explain away the molten steel through the use of false arguments (the jet fuel one) or to portray this as a feature of the post collapse fires. However, melted steel is present and no ordinary fire, even later ones in the rubble pile, can produce this result. This fact further contributes to the cumulative nature of the evidence in favour of the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers (not to mention WTC7).

At a later date we find further criticism of Shermer this time from Professor Anthony Hall who outlines the basic nature of his phony arguments in 2010.

Professor Hall identified a similar fraudulent approach being used by Shermer in an essay titled 'Scholarship, Scams and Credentials in an Academic House of Cards'. In essence Shermer is found guilty of misrepresenting key 911 truth arguments by using false associations (ie melted steel to jet fuel, and 911 conspiracy theorists to Holocaust deniers). Hall writes that:

    I was not prepared for the virulence of Shermer’s verbal attacks on the wide array of targets he groups together with his McCarthyesque tactics of guilt by association. Shermer places a tent of his own imagination over a vast array of thinkers who have addressed a broad number of issues. Rather than dealing with individual thinkers as such, or dealing with the specific elements of this or that contention, hypothesis or theory, Shermer simply groups together the targets of his ridicule as an undifferentiated mass of “conspiracy theorists.” For Shermer conspiracy theorists include all those who question the lone gunman theory concerning the assassination of US President John F. Kennedy, those who believe that the US moon landing was a staged event, those who address the possibility that Earth has been visited by creatures from outer space, and those who challenge various aspects of the government interpretation of what happened on 9/11. As he conflates all these issues, Shermer projects multiple power point slides showing images of human brains. These images seemed to me to be calculated to convey the message that mental illness forms the common denominator of those Shermer collectively condemns as crazed conspiracy theorists.

Shermer does major violence to the laws of evidence and proof by making vast and unsubstantiated generalizations about so-called conspiracy theorists rather than addressing the diversity of good, bad, or indifferent work done by thousands of investigators exploring scores of circumscribed problems. Shermer’s circus of pseudo-skepticism sets a terrible example for students and junior researchers. They would and should be blocked from advancing up the ladder of professional scholarship if they were to replicate Shermer’s unique brand of materialist evangelization aimed at turning the zeal of his converts against the demonized others. The complex of alleged connections said to link all thinkers with whom Shermer disagrees draws vital intellectual energies away from the tried and true methodology of setting out specific research problems that are narrowly enough defined to be comprehensively addressed with careful reference to relevant academic literature.

Shermer adds insult to injury when he indicates that all those addressing subjects that he has decided are closed to further critical examination belong in the same category as Holocaust Deniers. Here Shermer really crosses the line from mere malevolence into outright slander. As I see it this despicable smear tactic, one too frequently deployed in the effort to discredit those calling attention to certain categories of human rights violation, demeans and exploits the horrific legacy of the Nazi efforts to annihilate European Jewry. Such semantic abuses do severe injustice to the sanctity of the memory of a terrible event in history that illustrates the depths of depravity to which human beings are capable of stooping.
http://www.salem-news.com/articles/october282010/scholarship-scams-ah.php  

The key point to remember with 'Skeptics' like Michael Shermer is they will use a mixture of approaches that, although not constituting a rational argument, can seem reasonable to the undisciplined thinker - especially to those not familiar with the subject matter:

1. They mix together real examples of debunked, or highly questionable belief, with the current issue under review, in order to generally slander a particular line of legitimate inquiry. To these 'skeptics' there are no distinctions between the various subjects under examination - everything is the same! It is guilt, or ridicule, by association rather than addressing the specific evidence (or lack thereof) of each case. This is an exercise in presumptive dismissal. It is an unscientific and illogical approach and good observers will realise its use by pseudo skeptics to avoid whole issues as well as providing cover against answering a specific question.

2. In specific arguments the 'skeptics' often claim they are using the scientific method but instead propagate a false analogy or 'explanation' in order to dismiss the argument being made or the evidence cited. Often their false 'scientific' arguments rest on wrong assumptions. They can go into great detail, but when their basic premises are in error, they are not talking about the relevant issue.

For example, regarding the jet fuel or office fire argument that contends that the fires didn't need to melt steel but only weaken it in order for the Towers to collapse - this is an example of a false argument designed to cover for the fact that melted steel was actually found. Great detail can be made in explaining how normal fire temperatures cannot melt steel in order to avoid the fact that it was found.

The 911 truth argument is simply that there is evidence of large quantities of molten steel found in the rubble pile - that it clearly came from melted beams or columns, that there were pools of melted steel, and large amounts of iron spheres found in the dust. The obvious and logical implication here is that incendiaries must have been involved since office fires and jet fuel could not cause such phenomena.

It is apparent that Shermer's overall approach seeks to discourage rational thought (via misplaced ridicule) and to hide or obfuscate key evidence that points to inside involvement in the crime with false arguments.  However, by carefully following the Shermer line of argument, and asking if he has adequately addressed the specific points of key evidence (this sometimes requires a bit of research on the part of the observer), anyone can deduce whether what is being put forward is credible - especially when it comes to basic points like melted steel or the freefall collapse rate of WTC7 (not to mention the recorded sounds of explosions and the witness testimony to these events).

Any rational witness to intrinsically false arguments, such as the ones advocated by Shermer, will almost always be able to recognise them. This leads us to suppose that Michael Shermer, who is obviously not unintelligent, more than likely realises the bankruptcy of his own arguments and is, as the critics above suggest, an agent of disinformation.

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2013/10/michael-shermer-pseudo-skeptical.html

More Debunking the Debunkers blog posts relating to Shermer.

Related:

Shermer set up David Cole, the holocaust denier, to get beat up by thugs, and was recorded admitting that he helped incite violence against him or something close to that. Ry Dawson interviewed Cole about what happened (malicious slandering etc):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fww1AduLo1s&bpctr=1555511011

He “debated” James Fox and Stanton Freeman on CNN. Shermer uses his generalist reactions and doesn't properly rebut points made by (actual cases) the other panelists:

UFO Experts James Fox,Michael Shermer,Stanton Friedman,C2C Noory+ On Larry King Live 13Jul2007

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i64tQXEmgpc

Here’s an earlier post with Shermer vs Gage in late 2008. At this stage it looks like Shermer was wheeled out to give a generalised rebuttal, which then morphed into a slightly more ‘sophisticated’ ‘rebuttal’ a number of years later:

http://spookyweather.blogspot.com/2008/09/911-debate-richard-gage-verses-michael.html

And then there is the issue where James Randi admitted, in reaction to rape claim against Shermer, that he has a bit of a reputation for this sort of thing (being sleezy to women, and getting complaints). Shermer denies everything, but even Randi makes that admission, which seems like a real kicker to me:

https://www.buzzfeed.com/markoppenheimer/will-misogyny-bring-down-the-atheist-movement

Did Donald Trump’s new ‘Space Force’ really ‘kill’ seven rogue CIA satellites?

Published on September 2, 2018

Did Donald Trump’s new ‘Space Force’ really ‘kill’ seven rogue CIA satellites last week?

Donald Trump recently warned the world (June 18, 2015) that America was to build a military space force. What really happened to seven CIA spy satellites on August 30, 2018?

As we reported (August 31, 2018) key CIA satellites were allegedly ‘taken out’ in a precision attack conducted by the US military.

These claims spawned from within the weirdest and fast-spreading story online – the ‘QAnon’ phenomenon. The ‘QAnon’ folk are claiming that a ‘star wars’ battle took place between Donald Trump (& US Military) versus the ‘Deep State’ (aided by the CIA).

At stake are all our national democracies versus the globalist vision of unelected, corporate one world government.

Check the QAnon ‘intel drops’ for yourselves. A site showing all the ‘proofs’ is at qproofs.com. But be warned – it is addictive!

Our story (Aug 31, 2018) covered the claims that the American military deliberately destroyed/disabled SEVEN CIA spy satellites allegedly being used for unlawful purposes. The word ‘treason’ is used copiously. Other sources seem to confirm this sensational story.

The Chicago Tribune in ‘Spy v Spy’ had warned us back in 2000:

“the CIA has indeed named its huge computers after the Seven Dwarfs — and for all I know has a slinky blond in its cloak-and-dagger Directorate of Operations code-named Snow White.”

On reading the astonishing ‘breadcrumbs’  (intel drop) from ‘Q’ – found at  https://qanon.app – QAnon followers have linked this ‘tactical strike’ to a de-classified US government space weapons project called ‘Horizon.’

They claim a link because ‘Q’ (military intel) had cryptically inserted the word ‘Horizon’ to accompany the announcement that  ‘Snow White’s ‘Seven Dwarfs’ (the CIA spy satellites) were no more!

In Principia Scientific international’s article last week our experts addressed the claims. Is this all a huge LARP or a  real, but sinister story the mainstream media is afraid to address?

Without doubt it is accepted that ‘Trump directs Pentagon to create military Space Force‘ (CBS News).

‘QAnon’ – dismissed last year as conspiracy theory nonsense is today a rapidly-growing online phenomenon entering the mainstream. It appears that ‘Q’ drops cryptic snippets of intel that are later proved true as events unfold in Washington DC and around the globe.

More:

https://principia-scientific.org/update-destroyed-cia-satellites-space-weapons-used/

Related:

The Truth Behind Trump's "Space Force" - Trump Announces Space Force As Sixth Branch Of The Military To Protect Satellites; Visit Mars, Moon:

http://undebunkingufos.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-truth-behind-trumps-space-force.html

Could QAnon Be Artificial Intelligence?! You Gotta Hear This...

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2019/01/could-qanon-be-artificial-intelligence.html

The CIA Commits Over 100,000 Serious Crimes Each Year:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2011/03/cia-commits-over-100000-serious-crimes.html

Man from UFO crash/retrieval unit SPEAKS LIVE

Man from UFO crash/retrieval unit SPEAKS LIVE

Scientists await first black hole image, expected Wednesday

BOSTON HERALD

A first-ever image of the black hole at the heart of our galaxy is expected to be released Wednesday — giving astrophysicists hope that visual evidence of Albert Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity might be at hand. The Event Horizon Telescope project — an international array of telescopes aligned with the specific purpose of capturing an image of the “supermassive” Sagittarius A* black hole — is expected to make the announcement and release the image April 10 in Brussels. A press release is touting “a groundbreaking result from the EHT.” The science press is interpreting that to mean the long-awaited image of a black hole. “I never thought I’d see this in my lifetime,” said Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge. “We’re seeing the most extreme conditions in nature. A place where space and time are torn apart. It’s almost a mythical region.”

READ MORE AT THE BOSTON HERALD

Retired Police Officer's Alien Encounters Will Amaze YOU 2019

Retired Police Officer's Alien Encounters Will Amaze YOU 2019

UFOs Over DC: The Forgotten Crisis. Richard Dolan.

UFOs are too readily dismissed and forgotten in our history, despite having been central to some of the most dramatic moments in the 20th and 21st centuries. One of them concerned the repeated overflights of unknown craft over the capital of the United States during the summer of 1952, an incredible year of shocking military encounters with these objects.



[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, April 2nd, 2019.]

Owen Benjamin : About The Fake Moon Landing (Ep 178)

Owen Benjamin : About The Fake Moon Landing (Ep 178)

Related:

NASA Whistleblowers Prove Flying Saucers and Aliens Exist

Concerning the moon (AKA debris of a spacecraft?) related material below, if man did land on the moon, there is still a conspiracy going on to cover-up what we found. Either that, or the moon whistleblowers here are mixed up in a disinformation campaign to cover-up that we didn't go...

http://undebunkingufos.blogspot.com/2015/03/nasa-whistleblowers-prove-flying.html